Please note the following when reviewing this HTML version of the Policy:
[ back to top ]
Ableism: A belief system analogous to racism, sexism, or ageism that sees persons with disabilities as being less worthy of respect and consideration, less able to contribute and participate, or of less inherent value than others. Ableism may be conscious or unconscious and may be embedded in institutions, systems, or the broader culture of a society. It can limit the opportunities of persons with disabilities and reduce their inclusion in the life of their communities.
Accessibility: The term accessibility means giving people of all abilities opportunities to participate fully in everyday life. It is used to describe how widely a service, product, device, or environment is available to as many people as possible. Accessibility can be seen as the ability to access and benefit from a system, service, product, or environment.
Accommodation: A means of preventing and removing barriers that impede full participation and access based on the prohibited grounds of discrimination. Accommodation is initiated when an individual identifies their need to be accommodated, for example, a disability-related accommodation. Below are definitions of academic and workplace accommodations; refer to the full accommodation policies for details:
Accessible Formats and Communication Supports:
Barriers: Obstacles that limit access and prevent people with disabilities from fully participating in society. Most barriers are not intentional. Considering the needs of persons with disabilities at the design and development stage of a process may help prevent such barriers.
Culture of accessibility:[3] A culture of accessibility recognizes the value of inclusivity, and everything is viewed through the lens of inclusiveness. For example, teams are developed that include people with disabilities. Products and services are designed for accessibility by all users. Supervisors fully support the culture of accessibility and ensure all staff have access to the resources needed to perform at the highest level. No one in the workplace is left behind because of their disability. This is the culture beyond accommodations.
Dignity: How a service is provided in a way that allows the individual to maintain self-respect and the respect of other persons.
Disability (OHRC): The concept of disability may be interpreted in different ways depending on the context, such as medical, social, and human rights. Historically, the University (and the broader society) has relied on the definition of disability from the Human Rights Code (§10). While this list is not exhaustive, the Human Rights Code includes the following in its definition of disability:
Refer also to Section A: Terms and Definitions: Disability, as used in this Policy.
Duty to Accommodate: Under the Human Rights Code, employers and unions, housing providers and service providers have a legal duty to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities who are adversely affected by a requirement, rule or standard. Accommodation is necessary to ensure that people with disabilities have equal opportunities, access, and benefits. The duty to accommodate has both a substantive and a procedural component. The procedure to assess an accommodation (the process) is as important as the substantive content of the accommodation (the accommodation provided).
Equal Opportunity: How a service is provided to individuals in such a way that they have an opportunity to access goods or services equal to that given to others.
Independence: When a person can complete tasks on their own without unnecessary help or interference from others.
Integration: How a service is provided in a way that allows every individual to benefit from equivalent services, in the same place, and in the same or similar way as other individuals, with as many measures as necessary to enable everyone to access goods or services.
Intersectionality:[4] The concept of ‘intersectionality’ has been defined as “intersectional oppression [that] arises out of the combination of various oppressions which, together, produce something unique and distinct from any one form of discrimination standing alone”. An intersectional approach takes into account the historical, social and political context and recognizes the unique experience of the individual based on the intersection of all relevant grounds.
Ongoing Evaluation from the User’s Perspective: How well the design of the environment, services and supportive behavior enables functioning, performance, and well-being.
Reasonable Efforts: Taking approaches that meet the required needs of the individual.
Service Animal: Any guide dog, signal dog, or other animal individually trained to provide assistance to a person with a disability. If they meet this definition, animals are considered service animals. A service animal is not a pet. Service animals perform some of the functions and tasks that the person with a disability cannot perform for themselves.
Stigma:[5] Stigma is experienced by an individual when they “possess an attribute that marks them as different and leads them to be devalued in the eyes of others”. Student: A student is any individual recorded by the University Registrar as enrolled in an educational course of study recognized by the Senate and for whom the University maintains education records.
Supervisor: There are various types of supervisors within the University Community, which include the following:
Support Person is any person who provides assistance to a person with a disability.
Systemic Discrimination includes policies, practices, and institutional procedures which, deliberately or not, have the effect of creating or perpetuating disadvantage and discrimination against identifiable groups on grounds prohibited by the Human Rights Code.
Universal Design:[6] As outlined in the Human Rights Code, effective inclusive design will minimize the need for people to ask for individualized accommodation. The concept of universal design, which requires those who develop or provide laws, policies, programs or services to take into account diversity from the outset, is connected to the principle of autonomy and independence in that, when properly implemented, universal design removes from persons with disabilities the burden of navigating onerous accommodation processes and negotiating the accommodations and supports that they need in order to live autonomously and independently. In this way, the principle of autonomy and independence is closely linked to that of participation and inclusion.
Usability: The ease of access and / or use of a product, design, or space.
Visitors: Individuals who are not Community Members, Contractors, Lessees or Volunteers, but who want or need to attend University property for conferences, recreation, sporting events, concerts / performances and restaurant patrons. Guests of the McMaster hotel properties are also considered Visitors.
This Policy is to be read in conjunction with the following policies, statements, legislation, and collective agreements. Any question of the application of this Policy or related policies shall be determined by the Vice-Provost / Associate Vice-President (Equity and Inclusion), or their delegate, and in conjunction with the administrator of the other policy or policies.
The University reserves the right to amend or add to the University’s policies and statements from time to time (this is not a comprehensive list).
[1] The role of Vice-Provost, Equity and Inclusion may alternate to, Associate Vice-President Equity and Inclusion when the incumbent is not a tenured faculty member.
[2] For more information, visit the Accessibility Hub Training and Resources pages. Also, the Forward with FLEXibility: A Teaching and Learning Resource on Accessibility and Inclusion.
[3] Source: DiversityCan
[4] Source: Ontario Human Rights Commission, following M. Eaton, “Patently Confused, Complex Inequality and Canada v. Mossop” (1994) 1 Rev. Cons. Stud. 203 at 229.
[5] Source: Brenda Major and Laurie T. O’Brien, “The social psychology of stigma,” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005 56:393-421 at 395.
[6] Sources: Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Law Commission of Ontario.